Re: [GIT PULL] EFI changes
From: Matt Fleming
Date: Mon Oct 28 2013 - 16:31:07 EST
On Mon, 28 Oct, at 04:55:25PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Oct, at 02:44:13PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > and this breaks the ARM build:
> > >
> > > In file included from /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:44:
> > > /home/mingo/tip/include/linux/efi.h:842:21: error: asm/efi.h: No such file or directory
> > > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c: In function 'start_kernel':
> > > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:638: error: implicit declaration of function 'efi_enabled'
> > > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:639: error: implicit declaration of function 'efi_late_init'
> > > /home/mingo/tip/init/main.c:640: error: implicit declaration of function 'efi_free_boot_services'
> > Ah, that's my own fault because my 'next' branch doesn't include
> > the ARM EFI support. Where did you get the patches from? Are they
> > in linux-next?
> It's all in tip:x86/efi.
> > I'm inclined to drop the cleanup patch for now and do it later,
> > once things have settled because it's also causing conflicts for
> > Borislav's work.
OK, I've pushed out the 'next' branch and retagged it as 'efi-next'
(again), which hopefully should be finally free from build errors.
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/