Re: [PATCH 6/8] perf tools: Add new comm infrastructure

[David Ahern]

On 10/25/13 12:12 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Oh I see. It's possible that my massive conversion to use the comm
> accessor got blind at some point and left over a few things. I
> remember that I only lightly tested that new comm infrastructure. I
> mean I tested a lot of "perf report -s foo,bar" combinations for
> performance comparisons but I haven't tested the perf script and all
> the other perf tools.
>
> I'll rebase these patches and test that wider before resending.

specifically, I see stuff like perf forking ls and comm still shows as 
perf even though there is COMM record with the rename to ls. I believe 
the test case was something like:

perf sched record -- ls
perf script

David

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/