Re: [PATCH 6/8] perf tools: Add new comm infrastructure
From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Fri Oct 25 2013 - 14:12:43 EST
2013/10/25 David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On 10/25/13 7:04 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:56:31AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu:
>>> 2013/10/11 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>> From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> This new comm infrastructure provides two features:
>>> I was wondering about the fate of these patches. I can resend these or
>>> do any rebase if you need to.
>> So I applied the first few patches, but deferred working on this part,
>> the comm one, because Jiri Olsa had some problems with it, IIRC, Jiri?
>> Can you refresh my mind and ellaborate on it?
> I also saw some comm related problems with Namhyung's tree. Not sure if it
> contained all of Frederic's patches. I have not had time to chase down what
> is going on -- just that comm's coming out of perf-script were not correct.
Oh I see. It's possible that my massive conversion to use the comm
accessor got blind at some point and left over a few things. I
remember that I only lightly tested that new comm infrastructure. I
mean I tested a lot of "perf report -s foo,bar" combinations for
performance comparisons but I haven't tested the perf script and all
the other perf tools.
I'll rebase these patches and test that wider before resending.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/