Re: [PATCH V2 Resend 00/34] CPUFreq Cleanup Part III

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Fri Oct 25 2013 - 09:55:50 EST


On 25 October 2013 18:26, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Having considered that a bit I think that I'd prefer one patch doing all of
> these changes in one go (and with all applicable ACKs collected), one of the
> reasons being that if it is necessary to revert that stuff, whatever the
> reason, it will be much easier to do that with just one commit than with
> 34 of them.

With a similar reason I think the probability is more that a revert might
be required for individual drivers as they may need to switch back to
->target() instead of ->target_index() and so keeping them separate
might be better.

In case we need to revert all patches due to some breakage, we can
always do that in a single commit if required.

What do you say?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/