Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree
From: Will Deacon
Date: Fri Oct 25 2013 - 09:26:46 EST
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 02:03:42PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in
> caused by commits 405ffbd (perf tools: Check libunwind for availability of
> dwarf parsing feature) and mostly 308e1e7 (tools/perf/build: Clean up the
> libunwind logic in config/Makefile) as well as various follow-up patches.
> I fixed it up (see below). Please verify that the resolution looks good.
> Also note that this isn't really a trivial resolution of a conflict, but
> required modifying various other files. That causes rerere magic not to
> work and needs part of conflict to be resolved manually. Perhaps a good
> idea would be to rebase Jean's patch on top of the cleanups going on in
> the tip tree? Perhaps even carry the patch in the tip tree?
These came via my tree (arm perf) after discussion here:
Now that they've been pulled by rmk, we can't back them out with ugly
reverts, so I'm not sure what we can do to resolve in the ARM tree; it looks
like the perf Makefile has changed significantly in -tip.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/