Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: rtl8192se: Fix wrong assignment

From: Larry Finger
Date: Fri Oct 18 2013 - 21:34:18 EST


On 10/18/2013 08:05 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 21:52 -0300, Felipe Pena wrote:
There is a typo in the struct member name on assignment when checking
rtlphy->current_chan_bw == HT_CHANNEL_WIDTH_20_40, the check uses pwrgroup_ht40
for bound limit and uses pwrgroup_ht20 when assigning instead.

Signed-off-by: Felipe Pena <felipensp@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/rf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/rf.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/rf.c
index 5061f1d..92d38ab 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/rf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/rf.c
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static void _rtl92s_get_txpower_writeval_byregulatory(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
rtlefuse->pwrgroup_ht40
[RF90_PATH_A][chnl - 1]) {
pwrdiff_limit[i] =
- rtlefuse->pwrgroup_ht20
+ rtlefuse->pwrgroup_ht40
[RF90_PATH_A][chnl - 1];
}

Using min could help minimize typos

pwrdiff_limit[i] = min(pwrdiff_limit[i],
rtlefuse->pwrgroup_ht40[RF90_PATH_A][chnl - 1]);

In the initial driver, that would have been true; however, at this point, I prefer the patch as submitted. There is less churning of the source.

Larry


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/