Re: [PATCH 0/6] percpu: Implement Preemption checks for __this_cpuoperations V4

[Ingo Molnar]

* Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > That won't cause email servers to reject the mails, it just makes the 
> > patches a bit harder to review.
> 
> I do not have any control over how my ISP sorts these emails. [...]

Your series from today has proper threading - so after all it _was_ 
possible for you to send a patch series correctly?

Note that you did not address the other problem that David Miller pointed 
out, the Cc list still looks messed up:

Message-Id: <20131015180050.084352174@xxxxxxxxx>
User-Agent: quilt/0.60-1
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:58:53 -0500
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] net: Replace __get_cpu_var uses

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/