[PATCH] Revert "regulator: da9052: Use apply_[reg|bit] with regmapbased voltage_sel operations"

From: Axel Lin
Date: Wed Oct 16 2013 - 05:34:11 EST


This reverts commit 68f7506017ba67f1334cf086ffab76606f2c5ac4.

Michael reported that with this patch we loose the fix_io code path from
da9052_reg_update. Thus revert it.

Reported-by: Michael Grzeschik <mgr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi Mark,
I'm busy recently and not able to cook a proper fix in regmap for this issue now.
Unless someone can send the fix for *3.12*, otherwise we have no choice but have
to revert this patch.

Regards,
Axel
drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.c
index c427e42..3adeaef 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.c
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct da9052_regulator_info {
int step_uV;
int min_uV;
int max_uV;
+ unsigned char activate_bit;
};

struct da9052_regulator {
@@ -209,6 +210,36 @@ static int da9052_map_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
return sel;
}

+static int da9052_regulator_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
+ unsigned int selector)
+{
+ struct da9052_regulator *regulator = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+ struct da9052_regulator_info *info = regulator->info;
+ int id = rdev_get_id(rdev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = da9052_reg_update(regulator->da9052, rdev->desc->vsel_reg,
+ rdev->desc->vsel_mask, selector);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* Some LDOs and DCDCs are DVC controlled which requires enabling of
+ * the activate bit to implment the changes on the output.
+ */
+ switch (id) {
+ case DA9052_ID_BUCK1:
+ case DA9052_ID_BUCK2:
+ case DA9052_ID_BUCK3:
+ case DA9052_ID_LDO2:
+ case DA9052_ID_LDO3:
+ ret = da9052_reg_update(regulator->da9052, DA9052_SUPPLY_REG,
+ info->activate_bit, info->activate_bit);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static struct regulator_ops da9052_dcdc_ops = {
.get_current_limit = da9052_dcdc_get_current_limit,
.set_current_limit = da9052_dcdc_set_current_limit,
@@ -216,7 +247,7 @@ static struct regulator_ops da9052_dcdc_ops = {
.list_voltage = da9052_list_voltage,
.map_voltage = da9052_map_voltage,
.get_voltage_sel = regulator_get_voltage_sel_regmap,
- .set_voltage_sel = regulator_set_voltage_sel_regmap,
+ .set_voltage_sel = da9052_regulator_set_voltage_sel,
.is_enabled = regulator_is_enabled_regmap,
.enable = regulator_enable_regmap,
.disable = regulator_disable_regmap,
@@ -226,7 +257,7 @@ static struct regulator_ops da9052_ldo_ops = {
.list_voltage = da9052_list_voltage,
.map_voltage = da9052_map_voltage,
.get_voltage_sel = regulator_get_voltage_sel_regmap,
- .set_voltage_sel = regulator_set_voltage_sel_regmap,
+ .set_voltage_sel = da9052_regulator_set_voltage_sel,
.is_enabled = regulator_is_enabled_regmap,
.enable = regulator_enable_regmap,
.disable = regulator_disable_regmap,
@@ -243,14 +274,13 @@ static struct regulator_ops da9052_ldo_ops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,\
.vsel_reg = DA9052_BUCKCORE_REG + DA9052_ID_##_id, \
.vsel_mask = (1 << (sbits)) - 1,\
- .apply_reg = DA9052_SUPPLY_REG, \
- .apply_bit = (abits), \
.enable_reg = DA9052_BUCKCORE_REG + DA9052_ID_##_id, \
.enable_mask = 1 << (ebits),\
},\
.min_uV = (min) * 1000,\
.max_uV = (max) * 1000,\
.step_uV = (step) * 1000,\
+ .activate_bit = (abits),\
}

#define DA9052_DCDC(_id, step, min, max, sbits, ebits, abits) \
@@ -264,14 +294,13 @@ static struct regulator_ops da9052_ldo_ops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,\
.vsel_reg = DA9052_BUCKCORE_REG + DA9052_ID_##_id, \
.vsel_mask = (1 << (sbits)) - 1,\
- .apply_reg = DA9052_SUPPLY_REG, \
- .apply_bit = (abits), \
.enable_reg = DA9052_BUCKCORE_REG + DA9052_ID_##_id, \
.enable_mask = 1 << (ebits),\
},\
.min_uV = (min) * 1000,\
.max_uV = (max) * 1000,\
.step_uV = (step) * 1000,\
+ .activate_bit = (abits),\
}

static struct da9052_regulator_info da9052_regulator_info[] = {
--
1.8.1.2



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/