Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Allow spaces before the ':' of a bitfield

From: Josh Triplett
Date: Mon Oct 14 2013 - 16:21:16 EST


On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:04:38AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 11:00 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:51:48AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 10:32 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > > checkpatch warns about spaces both before and after the ':' separating a
> > > > bitfield name from its width. However, many drivers do put space before
> > > > the : to line up the widths, which makes the definition significantly
> > > > more readable; checkpatch should not warn about that. Remove the
> > > > warning for space before the ':' of a bitfield.
> > >
> > > There are a _bunch_ of different styles used for
> > > alignment of bitfields.
> > >
> > > $ grep -rPh --include=*.[ch] \
> > > '(?:unsigned\s+|signed\s+|)(char|short|long|long\s+long|\w+_t|(?:__|)(?:u|s)(?:8|16|32|64))\s+\w+\s*:\s*\d+\s*(?:,|;)' *
> > >
> > > spaces before colon
> > > spaces after colon
> > > aligned on bitfield size
> > >
> > > I'd just as soon make it a --strict check.
> >
> > I'd be fine with removing the check entirely, or making it --strict;
> > however, even for --strict mode I'd suggest applying this patch, as I
> > don't think checkpatch should ever prohibit spaces before the ':'.
>
> Maybe something like that patch, but spaces probably
> should be prohibited after the : in a bitfield either.
>
> This style is pretty common
>
> u32 dma_address0 :30;
> u32 dma_0No_update : 1;
> u32 dma_0start : 1;
> u32 dma_addr_size :24;
> u32 DMA_maxpackets : 8;

I'm fine with just dropping the check entirely; want a patch for that
instead? It's a much simpler patch.

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/