Re: [PATCHSET v2] sysfs: use seq_file and unify regular and bin filehandling

[Tejun Heo]

Hello, guys.

Sorry about the delay.

On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:11:18PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> [  448.189960] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  448.195214] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 69219 at fs/sysfs/file.c:79
> sysfs_file_ops+0x59/0x70()

So, that's "lockdep_assert_held(sd);" in sysfs_file_ops().

> [  448.273805]  [<ffffffff81248bd9>] sysfs_file_ops+0x59/0x70
> [  448.279973]  [<ffffffff81249628>] sysfs_open_file+0x88/0x330

Triggering from sysfs_open_file()

> [  448.366842] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  448.372030] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 69219 at fs/sysfs/file.c:79
> sysfs_file_ops+0x59/0x70()
...
> [  448.457806]  [<ffffffff81248cbb>] sysfs_seq_show+0xcb/0x180

and then from sysfs_seq_show(), which is weird because
lockdep_assert_held(sd) checks whether sd's active ref is held and
both do hold them.  Hmm.... ah, right, I forgot about
->ignore_lockdep, we need to skip the assertion for files marked with
ignore_lockdep.  Will send a patch soon.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/