[PATCH] EDAC: remove deprecated IRQF_DISABLED

From: Michael Opdenacker
Date: Sun Oct 13 2013 - 01:18:31 EST


This patch proposes to remove the use of the IRQF_DISABLED flag

It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.

Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c | 7 +++----
drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c | 8 ++++----
drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
index 3eb32f6..7785807 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ int mpc85xx_pci_err_probe(struct platform_device *op)
if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) {
pdata->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op->dev.of_node, 0);
res = devm_request_irq(&op->dev, pdata->irq,
- mpc85xx_pci_isr, IRQF_DISABLED,
+ mpc85xx_pci_isr, 0,
"[EDAC] PCI err", pci);
if (res < 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static int mpc85xx_l2_err_probe(struct platform_device *op)
if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) {
pdata->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op->dev.of_node, 0);
res = devm_request_irq(&op->dev, pdata->irq,
- mpc85xx_l2_isr, IRQF_DISABLED,
+ mpc85xx_l2_isr, 0,
"[EDAC] L2 err", edac_dev);
if (res < 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR
@@ -1078,8 +1078,7 @@ static int mpc85xx_mc_err_probe(struct platform_device *op)
/* register interrupts */
pdata->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op->dev.of_node, 0);
res = devm_request_irq(&op->dev, pdata->irq,
- mpc85xx_mc_isr,
- IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_SHARED,
+ mpc85xx_mc_isr, IRQF_SHARED,
"[EDAC] MC err", mci);
if (res < 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Unable to request irq %d for "
diff --git a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
index 542fad7..6366e88 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static int mv64x60_pci_err_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
res = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev,
pdata->irq,
mv64x60_pci_isr,
- IRQF_DISABLED,
+ 0,
"[EDAC] PCI err",
pci);
if (res < 0) {
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static int mv64x60_sram_err_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
res = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev,
pdata->irq,
mv64x60_sram_isr,
- IRQF_DISABLED,
+ 0,
"[EDAC] SRAM err",
edac_dev);
if (res < 0) {
@@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static int mv64x60_cpu_err_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
res = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev,
pdata->irq,
mv64x60_cpu_isr,
- IRQF_DISABLED,
+ 0,
"[EDAC] CPU err",
edac_dev);
if (res < 0) {
@@ -800,7 +800,7 @@ static int mv64x60_mc_err_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
res = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev,
pdata->irq,
mv64x60_mc_isr,
- IRQF_DISABLED,
+ 0,
"[EDAC] MC err",
mci);
if (res < 0) {
diff --git a/drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c
index ef6b7e0..7023944 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c
@@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@ static int ppc4xx_edac_register_irq(struct platform_device *op,

status = request_irq(ded_irq,
ppc4xx_edac_isr,
- IRQF_DISABLED,
+ 0,
"[EDAC] MC ECCDED",
mci);

@@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ static int ppc4xx_edac_register_irq(struct platform_device *op,

status = request_irq(sec_irq,
ppc4xx_edac_isr,
- IRQF_DISABLED,
+ 0,
"[EDAC] MC ECCSEC",
mci);

--
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/