Re: [PATCH] core: Catch overflows in do_div() function

From: Anatol Pomozov
Date: Tue Oct 08 2013 - 13:40:38 EST


Hi

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Anatol Pomozov
<anatol.pomozov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Richard Weinberger
> <richard.weinberger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 09:10 -0700, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
>>>> If second parameter passed to this function was 64 then it silently
>>>> truncates to 32 bits. Catch such situation.
>>> []
>>>> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/div64.h b/include/asm-generic/div64.h
>>> []
>>>> @@ -25,6 +26,7 @@
>>>> # define do_div(n,base) ({ \
>>>> uint32_t __base = (base); \
>>>> uint32_t __rem; \
>>>> + BUG_ON(sizeof(base) > 4 && base >= (1UL<<32)); \
>>>
>>> I think this would be better as a BUILD_BUG_ON
>>
>> No. BUILD_BUG_ON works only for constants.
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON might actually work. In case if 'base' is const it will
> check if it fits 32 bits. As far as I see all such usages (when 'base'
> is const) are fine. In case if 'base' is 64 bit variable the
> compilation fails.
>
> Comparing with previous patch (without "&& base >= (1UL<<32)") it
> eliminates warnings in situations when we pass small constants as long
> (dozens of such places in HEAD).
>
> Looking at the cases when we use do_div() I see that in many cases we
> pass "long" as a second parameter (see __setup_per_zone_wmarks). If we
> replace it with div64_s64() we force to use 64 bit arithmetic. But on
> 32bit platform "long" is 32bit and using div64_s64() here is
> redundant. Wouldn't it be better if do_div() would handle this
> situation and called required functions based on a) current
> architecture b) size of base/n parameters. Something like this
> (completely untested and we need __div64_64 on 32 bit platform):
>
> --- a/include/asm-generic/div64.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/div64.h
> @@ -22,12 +22,12 @@
>
> #if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
>
> -# define do_div(n,base) ({ \
> - uint32_t __base = (base); \
> - uint32_t __rem; \
> - __rem = ((uint64_t)(n)) % __base; \
> - (n) = ((uint64_t)(n)) / __base; \
> - __rem; \
> +# define do_div(n,base) ({ \
> + typeof(base) __base = (base); \

Documentation says typeof() has side-effects and can be used on
arithmetic types only. :(

> + typeof(base) __rem; \
> + __rem = (n) % __base; \
> + (n) = (n) / __base; \
> + __rem; \
> })
>
> #elif BITS_PER_LONG == 32
> @@ -37,16 +37,20 @@ extern uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *dividend,
> uint32_t divisor);
> /* The unnecessary pointer compare is there
> * to check for type safety (n must be 64bit)
> */
> -# define do_div(n,base) ({ \
> - uint32_t __base = (base); \
> - uint32_t __rem; \
> - (void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \
> - if (likely(((n) >> 32) == 0)) { \
> - __rem = (uint32_t)(n) % __base; \
> - (n) = (uint32_t)(n) / __base; \
> - } else \
> - __rem = __div64_32(&(n), __base); \
> - __rem; \
> +# define do_div(n,base) ({ \
> + typeof(base) __base = (base); \
> + typeof(base) __rem; \
> + (void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \
> + if (sizeof(__base) <= 4 || (__builtin_constant_p(__base) &&
> __base < (1ULL<<32)) ) { \
> + if (likely(((n) >> 32) == 0)) { \
> + __rem = (uint32_t)(n) % __base; \
> + (n) = (uint32_t)(n) / __base; \
> + } if (sizeof(base) <= 4) \
> + __rem = __div64_32(&(n), __base); \
> + } else { \
> + __rem = __div64_64(&(n), __base); \
> + } \
> + __rem; \
> })
>
> #else /* BITS_PER_LONG == ?? */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/