Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Perf support to SDT markers

[Hemant]

Hi,

On 10/07/2013 09:17 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Hemant Kumar <hkshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > [...]
> > A simple example to show this follows.
> > - Create a file with .d extension and mention the probe names in it with
> > provider name and marker name.
> > [...]
> > - Now create the probes.h and probes.o file :
> > $ dtrace -C -h -s probes.d -o probes.h
> > $ dtrace -C -G -s probes.d -o probes.o
> > [...]
> It may be worthwhile to document an even-simpler case:
>
> - no .d file
> - no invocation of the dtrace python script
> - no generated .h or .o file
> - in the C file, just add:
>
>    #include <sys/sdt.h>
>
>    void main () {
>         /* ... */
>         STAP_PROBE(provider_name,probe_name);
>         /* ... */
>    }
>
> - gcc file.c
> - stap -l 'process("./a.out").mark("*")' to list
>
>
> - FChE

Will add this example to the doc too.

--
Thanks
Hemant

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/