Re: [PATCH V4 8/9] perf buildid-cache: add ability to add kcore tothe cache

From: Namhyung Kim
Date: Tue Oct 08 2013 - 04:35:06 EST


On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 08/10/13 10:41, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:50:17 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> kcore can be used to view the running kernel object code.
>>> However, kcore changes as modules are loaded and unloaded,
>>> and when the kernel decides to modify its own code.
>>> Consequently it is useful to create a copy of kcore at a
>>> particular time. Unlike vmlinux, kcore is not unique
>>> for a given build-id. And in addition, the kallsyms
>>> and modules files are also needed. The tool therefore
>>> creates a directory:
>>>
>>> ~/.debug/[kernel.kcore]/<build-id>/<YYYYmmddHHMMSShh>
>>>
>>> which contains: kcore, kallsyms and modules.
>>
>> Hmm.. I think the problem is that the kallsyms and kcore also have
>> module information and the build-id of kernel can identify the core
>> kernel part only. So why not splitting modules from kcore and kallsyms?
>>
>> As the modules have their own build-id, we can extract module info from
>> kcore and kallsyms and put them under ~/.debug/[module]/<build-id>.
>> While at it, we can even synthesize symbol table and inject it into the
>> module kcore and get rid of the module kallsyms file.
>>
>> This way, we can identify all binaries using build-id only, no?
>
> No.
>
> kcore doesn't just give the module object code - it gives it
> linked in to the kernel. Unless you have the modules at the same
> addresses the linking doesn't match what you traced.

Ah.. right. I missed that.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/