Re: [PATCH 59/63] sched: numa: Remove the numa_balancing_scan_period_resetsysctl

[Rik van Riel]

On 10/07/2013 06:29 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> With scan rate adaptions based on whether the workload has properly
> converged or not there should be no need for the scan period reset
> hammer. Get rid of it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/