Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: Fix possible user space selector corruption

[David Vrabel]

On 04/10/13 14:33, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 04/10/13 14:20, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 01:51:32PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 11:04 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>> On 03/10/13 09:24, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Bisecting the code commit 7076aada1040de4ed79a5977dbabdb5e5ea5e249 appears
>>>>> to be the first one that have this issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> In terms of the correctness of the fix,
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Should this also go in stable tree?
> 
> Very much so.  The change which exposed it for us was from 3.7 iirc, but
> I believe it has been a latent bug for as long as the native early boot
> code uses __USER_DS.
> 
>>>> However, I am not sure the comment is necessary.  The prevailing style
>>>> is for no justification of loads of segment selectors on boot, and the
>>>> comment itself refers simply to an interaction issue of 32bit on Xen
>>>> when making use of sysenter.
>>>>
>>> Suggestion for the comment ??
>>>
>>> Frediano
> 
> My suggestion was to omit the comment entirely, or simplify it to just:

Suggesting comments should be omitted because other code is poorly
commented seems odd to me.

> /* Xen starts us with XEN_FLAT_RING1_DS, but linux code expects __USER_DS */

I do think this comment better summarizes the reason for loading the
segment registers so I'd prefer this.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/