Re: [PATCH] memstick: Fix memory leak in memstick_check() errorpath

[Catalin Marinas]

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 01:02:43AM +0100, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 10/04/2013 03:54 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On 3 October 2013 22:13, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/memstick/core/memstick.c b/drivers/memstick/core/memstick.c
> >> index ffcb10a..0c73a45 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/memstick/core/memstick.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/memstick/core/memstick.c
> >> @@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ static struct memstick_dev *memstick_alloc_card(struct memstick_host *host)
> >>          return card;
> >>   err_out:
> >>          host->card = old_card;
> >> +       kfree(card->dev.kobj.name);
> >
> > It looks weird to go into dev.kobj internals here for freeing the
> > name. There is also memstick_free_card() which doesn't seem to do
> > anything about the name freeing.
> >
> > Should memstick_alloc_card() do a device_initialise(&card->dev) and in
> > memstick_free_card() (or the error path) do a put_device(&card->dev)?
> > This should take care of kobj.name as well via kobject_put().
> 
> I tried several code changes that included adding a device_initialize() call, 
> but all of them oopsed even when I followed the examples in other drivers. 
> Adding a put_device() without the device_initialize() did not oops, but it still 
> leaked the name.
> 
> We could avoid going into the dev.kobj internals if a device_free_name() routine 
> existed as a companion to dev_set_name().

device_free_name() wouldn't be a bad idea.

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/