Re: [PATCH] kernel/irq/proc.c: set MAX_NAMELEN 11 instead of 10which express the maximize size of "%d" or "%u".

From: Joe Perches
Date: Sat Oct 05 2013 - 11:41:18 EST

Next message: Christian Daudt: "[PATCH v3] ARM: bcm: Add DEBUG_LL console support"
Previous message: Guenter Roeck: "Re: [PATCH] wdt: sunxi: Fix section mismatch"
In reply to: Chen Gang: "Re: [PATCH] kernel/irq/proc.c: set MAX_NAMELEN 11 instead of 10 whichexpress the maximize size of "%d" or "%u"."
Next in thread: Chen Gang: "Re: [PATCH] kernel/irq/proc.c: set MAX_NAMELEN 11 instead of 10 whichexpress the maximize size of "%d" or "%u"."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 23:19 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> Theoretically, the maximize size of "%d" or "%u" is 11 (10 + '\0'), so
> need set MAX_NAMELEN 11 instead of 10.

%d can be negative.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Christian Daudt: "[PATCH v3] ARM: bcm: Add DEBUG_LL console support"
Previous message: Guenter Roeck: "Re: [PATCH] wdt: sunxi: Fix section mismatch"
In reply to: Chen Gang: "Re: [PATCH] kernel/irq/proc.c: set MAX_NAMELEN 11 instead of 10 whichexpress the maximize size of "%d" or "%u"."
Next in thread: Chen Gang: "Re: [PATCH] kernel/irq/proc.c: set MAX_NAMELEN 11 instead of 10 whichexpress the maximize size of "%d" or "%u"."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]