Re: [PATCH v6 15/19] swiotlb-xen: call dma_capable only ifdev->dma_mask is allocated

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Date: Mon Sep 30 2013 - 12:03:00 EST


On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:10:03PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:

Why? I am looking at X86 and IA64 and I see:

79 if (!dev->dma_mask)
80 return 0;


Why not port dma_capable over to ARM?

> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> index 790c2eb..3011736 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ dma_addr_t xen_swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
> * buffering it.
> */
> if (!xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap) &&
> - dma_capable(dev, dev_addr, size) &&
> + dev->dma_mask && dma_capable(dev, dev_addr, size) &&
> !range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size) && !swiotlb_force)
> return dev_addr;
>
> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ dma_addr_t xen_swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
> /*
> * Ensure that the address returned is DMA'ble
> */
> - if (!dma_capable(dev, dev_addr, size)) {
> + if (dev->dma_mask && !dma_capable(dev, dev_addr, size)) {
> swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, map, size, dir);
> dev_addr = 0;
> }
> @@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ xen_swiotlb_map_sg_attrs(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
>
> if (swiotlb_force ||
> xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap) ||
> - !dma_capable(hwdev, dev_addr, sg->length) ||
> + (hwdev->dma_mask && !dma_capable(hwdev, dev_addr, sg->length)) ||
> range_straddles_page_boundary(paddr, sg->length)) {
> /*
> * Pass the dma_addr of the first slab in the iotlb buffer as
> --
> 1.7.2.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/