Re: [PATCH 1/4] driver core: introduce helper macro initcall_driver()

From: Hanjun Guo
Date: Mon Sep 30 2013 - 10:23:33 EST


On 2013å09æ30æ 17:16, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:13:52PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
For some devices especially on platform/I2C/SPI bus, they want to
be initialized earlier than other devices, so the driver use initcall
such as subsys_initcall to make this device initialize earlier.
We're trying to move away from needing to do this and to using deferred
probing to resolve init ordering issues. Should we not be able to
convert the drivers to module_X_driver()?
Hi Mark,

Thanks for your comments.

That would be great to move away *_initcall in module driver, and
this patch set is not necessary if we can use deferred probe to solve
all the init order issues.

Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/