Re: [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon Sep 30 2013 - 02:28:57 EST

* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If the goal is to feed this to the field width in printf, which I would
> think would be the dominant use, then you do have to account for the
> minus sign.

The input here is always a nonzero positive integer.

Anyway, I have no objections against using the more generic library
function either.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at