Re: [PATCH 10/12] clk: tegra: move fixed clocks to common file

From: Peter De Schrijver
Date: Tue Sep 24 2013 - 04:32:42 EST


On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 08:34:48PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/18/2013 08:41 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > Introduce a new file for fixed clocks common between several Tegra
> > SoCs and move Tegra114 to this new infrastructure.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-fixed.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-fixed.c
>
> > +void __init tegra_fixed_clk_init(struct tegra_clk *tegra_clks)
>
> > + /* clk_m_div2 */
> > + dt_clk = tegra_lookup_dt_id(tegra_clk_clk_m_div2, tegra_clks);
> > + if (dt_clk) {
> > + clk = clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "clk_m_div2", "clk_m",
> > + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 1, 2);
> > + clk_register_clkdev(clk, "clk_m_div2", NULL);
> > + *dt_clk = clk;
> > + }
>
> I guess "fixed" means "fixed at run-time", not "identical rate in all
> systems"? Since this is the crystal rate, it can vary between boards,
> but I supposed if "fixed" means "fixed at run-time", considering this as
> a fixed clock is fine.
>

Fixed means "fixed at run-time" indeed. Although clk_32k is 32768Hz on all
boards as well.

> But, isn't clk_m also a fixed clock then? I would expect one or two more

I guess the code from clk-tegra-osc.c could be moved here if you think that's
better?

> clocks in this file. What about clk_s, or is that known as clk_32k here?

I don't think we ever had clk_s in upstream?

Cheers,

Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/