Re: [PATCH v3] dma: add driver for R-Car HPB-DMAC

From: Guennadi Liakhovetski
Date: Sat Sep 14 2013 - 14:33:30 EST


On Sun, 25 Aug 2013, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:

> From: Max Filippov <max.filippov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add support for HPB-DMAC found in Renesas R-Car SoCs, using 'shdma-base' DMA
> driver framework.
>
> Based on the original patch by Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@xxxxxxxxxxx>.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Filippov <max.filippov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [Sergei: removed useless #include, sorted #include's, fixed HPB_DMA_TCR_MAX,
> fixed formats and removed line breaks in the dev_dbg() calls, rephrased and
> added IRQ # to the shdma_request_irq() failure message, added MODULE_AUTHOR(),
> removed '__init'/'__exit' annotations from the probe()/remove() methods, removed
> '__initdata' annotation from 'hpb_dmae_driver', fixed guard macro name in the
> header file, fixed #define ASYNCRSTR_ASRST20, added #define ASYNCRSTR_ASRST24,
> added the necessary runtime PM calls to the probe() and remove() methods,
> handled errors returned by dma_async_device_register(), beautified comments
> and #define's.]
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---

[snip]

> Index: slave-dma/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-hpbdma.c
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null
> +++ slave-dma/drivers/dma/sh/rcar-hpbdma.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,655 @@

[snip]

> +static int hpb_dmae_chan_probe(struct hpb_dmae_device *hpbdev, int id)
> +{
> + struct shdma_dev *sdev = &hpbdev->shdma_dev;
> + struct platform_device *pdev =
> + to_platform_device(hpbdev->shdma_dev.dma_dev.dev);
> + struct hpb_dmae_chan *new_hpb_chan;
> + struct shdma_chan *schan;
> +
> + /* Alloc channel */
> + new_hpb_chan = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> + sizeof(struct hpb_dmae_chan), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!new_hpb_chan) {
> + dev_err(hpbdev->shdma_dev.dma_dev.dev,
> + "No free memory for allocating DMA channels!\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + schan = &new_hpb_chan->shdma_chan;

A suggestion for an incremental patch - you might want to initialise the
max_xfer_len field like

schan->max_xfer_len = 64 * 1024 * 1024 - 1;

because if it isn't initialised your max transfer length will be 4k,
which will hurt your performance. I think you should get a better
throughput after that

> + shdma_chan_probe(sdev, schan, id);
> +
> + if (pdev->id >= 0)
> + snprintf(new_hpb_chan->dev_id, sizeof(new_hpb_chan->dev_id),
> + "hpb-dmae%d.%d", pdev->id, id);
> + else
> + snprintf(new_hpb_chan->dev_id, sizeof(new_hpb_chan->dev_id),
> + "hpb-dma.%d", id);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/