Re: [PATCH 069/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: Use generic cpufreq routines

[Andrew Lunn]

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 06:30:15PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
> and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
> by cpufreq drivers then.
> 
> This patch uses these generic routines for this driver.
> 
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 22 +++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Hi Viresh

You can add:

Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>

to

[PATCH 069/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: Use generic cpufreq routines
[PATCH 107/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: don't initialize part of policy that is set by core
[PATCH 161/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: Convert to light weight ->target_index() routine
[PATCH 195/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()

It does however require the patch:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg273378.html

but this is not because of this patch series, it was already broken.

Thanks
	Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/