Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: fix transition_ongoing count for powernow-k8

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Sat Sep 14 2013 - 00:29:38 EST


On 14 September 2013 05:12, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday, September 13, 2013 06:29:37 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> This has been running in my mind since few days... That we have fixed cpufreq
>> core and all other drivers for transition serialization but what about
>> powernow-k8? It is somewhat special (even more than exynos5440).. It queues a
>> work from ->target() and may or maynot send notifications at all..
>>
>> Finally I have got a solution now (detailed logs in the patch)..
>> These must go with following patchset:
>
> The "must go" here is a totally wrong way of speaking about things, because I'm
> not sure I'll take this patch series yet.
>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/12/173

The "must go" was about keeping all four patches together, rather than
forcing you to take them all..

Sorry for the confusion..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/