Re: [PATCH 211/228] cpufreq: tegra: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()

[Viresh Kumar]

On 14 September 2013 04:22, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I wonder if this series is bisectable? Perhaps I should just go and read
> the rest of the series, but I presume there's a patch somewhere else
> that adds those two cpufreq_notify_transition() to the cpufreq core.
> Either that happens before this patch (in which case listeners will get
> two notifications each time; perhaps that is safe?), or after this patch
> (in which case with just this patch applied, no notifications will be
> sent until a later patch!

Hmm.. Good Catch..

So, yes git bisect would be compilable but not runnable.. As we are
already serialized notifications and so two PRE notifications will
generate a crash..

But I don't want to get all that in a single patch as that would be:

 40 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 623 deletions(-)

And that would be hard to review it..

Any suggestions?

> Aside from that, all the Tegra-specific patches in this series,
> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/