Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] cpufreq: tegra: Re-model Tegra cpufreq driver

From: Stephen Warren
Date: Fri Sep 13 2013 - 18:26:26 EST


On 09/12/2013 05:24 AM, Bill Huang wrote:
> Re-model Tegra cpufreq driver to support all Tegra series of SoCs.
>
> * Make tegra-cpufreq.c a generic Tegra cpufreq driver.
> * Move Tegra20 specific codes into tegra20-cpufreq.c.
> * Bind Tegra cpufreq dirver with a fake device so defer probe would work
> when we're going to get regulator in the driver to support voltage
> scaling (DVFS).

> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm

> @@ -232,6 +232,12 @@ config ARM_TEGRA_CPUFREQ
> bool "TEGRA CPUFreq support"
> depends on ARCH_TEGRA
> select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
> +
> +config ARM_TEGRA20_CPUFREQ
> + bool "NVIDIA TEGRA20"
> + depends on ARM_TEGRA_CPUFREQ && ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC
> default y
> help
> - This adds the CPUFreq driver support for TEGRA SOCs.
> + This adds the CPUFreq driver for NVIDIA TEGRA20 SoC.
> +
> + If in doubt, say N.

This patch removes the following from "config ARM_TEGRA_CPUFREQ":

default y
help
This adds the CPUFreq driver support for TEGRA SOCs.

I think that option should be left unchanged, such that this patch
*just* adds the new option without changing the existing one. If you do
that, then you can completely drop patch 4/4.

Other than that, this series looks fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/