[PATCH 205/228] cpufreq: s5pv210: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()

[Viresh Kumar]

Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:

	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
	freqs.old = old freq...
	freqs.new = new freq...

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);

	/* Change rate here */

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);

This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.

Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.

Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.

Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 16 ++++++----------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
index 5978b94..e3973da 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
 static struct clk *cpu_clk;
 static struct clk *dmc0_clk;
 static struct clk *dmc1_clk;
-static struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(set_freq_lock);
 
 /* APLL M,P,S values for 1G/800Mhz */
@@ -179,6 +178,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 	unsigned int priv_index;
 	unsigned int pll_changing = 0;
 	unsigned int bus_speed_changing = 0;
+	unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
 	int arm_volt, int_volt;
 	int ret = 0;
 
@@ -193,12 +193,12 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 		goto exit;
 	}
 
-	freqs.old = s5pv210_getspeed(0);
-	freqs.new = s5pv210_freq_table[index].frequency;
+	old_freq = s5pv210_getspeed(0);
+	new_freq = s5pv210_freq_table[index].frequency;
 
 	/* Finding current running level index */
 	if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, s5pv210_freq_table,
-					   freqs.old, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H,
+					   old_freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H,
 					   &priv_index)) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto exit;
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 	arm_volt = dvs_conf[index].arm_volt;
 	int_volt = dvs_conf[index].int_volt;
 
-	if (freqs.new > freqs.old) {
+	if (new_freq > old_freq) {
 		ret = regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator,
 				arm_volt, arm_volt_max);
 		if (ret)
@@ -219,8 +219,6 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 			goto exit;
 	}
 
-	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
 	/* Check if there need to change PLL */
 	if ((index == L0) || (priv_index == L0))
 		pll_changing = 1;
@@ -431,9 +429,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 		}
 	}
 
-	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
-	if (freqs.new < freqs.old) {
+	if (new_freq < old_freq) {
 		regulator_set_voltage(int_regulator,
 				int_volt, int_volt_max);
 
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/