Re: [PATCH] memory: add a basic OF-based memory driver

From: Olof Johansson
Date: Thu Sep 12 2013 - 20:57:39 EST


On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Emilio López <emilio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This driver's only job is to claim and ensure the necessary clock
> for memory operation on a DT-powered machine remains enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emilio López <emilio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> I believe this new patch should resolve all the concerns raised; as
> always, all feedback is welcome :)

I think you're going about this the wrong way.

If you have a problem with a clock not staying on, shouldn't you just
marking it appropriately in the clock table instead, making sure it's
initialized with at least one reference to it? I believe that is how
some of the other platforms handle this, and it's a lot cleaner than
adding a fake binding and a fake driver just to grab a single clock.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/