Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf: parse the dwarf backtrace info from.debug_frame section

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:07:23PM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> -- Adding more maintainers in the To: list --
> 
> Ping about the patch set, is this one acceptable for mainline?

The below looks to be mostly ARM bits and I would suspect Will to take
care of them.

> On 9 September 2013 12:00, Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >  arch/arm/Kconfig                        |  2 +
> >  arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild        |  1 +
> >  arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h   | 23 +++++++++++
> >  arch/arm/kernel/Makefile                |  1 +
> >  arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c             | 30 ++++++++++++++
> >  tools/perf/arch/arm/Makefile            |  3 ++
> >  tools/perf/arch/arm/include/perf_regs.h | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tools/perf/arch/arm/util/unwind.c       | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tools/perf/config/Makefile              |  9 +++--
> >  tools/perf/util/unwind.c                | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------

This one looks to be generic code, Acme who do we want to look at that?

> >  10 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm/include/perf_regs.h
> >  create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm/util/unwind.c
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.11.7
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/