Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq: use correct values of cpus in __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, September 12, 2013 02:51:58 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12 September 2013 12:46, Srivatsa S. Bhat
> <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > That sounds good! Even the naming is much better, it conveys the intent
> > clearly.
> 
> Folded below change in my patch (attached):

Please resend.  And I honestly don't think that [1-3/5] are fixes and
[4/5] is not needed any more.

> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index b556d46..23f5845 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1111,7 +1111,7 @@ static int
> cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>         int ret;
> 
>         /* first sibling now owns the new sysfs dir */
> -       cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpumask_first(policy->cpus));
> +       cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpumask_any_but(policy->cpus, old_cpu));
> 
>         /* Don't touch sysfs files during light-weight tear-down */
>         if (frozen)
> 
> --

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/