Re: [PATCH V2] regulator: core: add support for configuring turn-ontime through constraints

[Laxman Dewangan]

On Wednesday 11 September 2013 11:16 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/11/2013 11:46 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 September 2013 10:47 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > - regulator-enable-ramp-delay: The time taken, in uSec, for the supply
> > > rail to reach the target voltage, plus/minus whatever tolerance the
> > > board design requires, once the regulator output itself has ramped up.
> > > This value is in addition to whatever built-in ramp time is inherent in
> > > the regulator's own internal design or configuration. This property
> > > describes the additional ramp time required due to board design issues
> > > such as trace capacitance and load on the supply.
> > >
> > > That's text repeats "additional" a bit, but I think describes the
> > > situation correctly?
> > I wanted to provide the absolute delay rather than additional delay on
> > top of inherit delay from device.
> I suppose that either is fine from a DT perspective. But, the regulator
> drivers already know their internal delay, so presumably driver code
> will have to take the value from DT, and subtract out whatever delay the
> driver already embodies, in order to calculate the extra delay required?
> Or, if this property is set, does the driver-specified delay just get
> ignored?

Yes, if property is available then driver-specified delay get ignored. 
Delay will be used from dt provided value.

Thanks,
Laxman


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/