Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown

[joeyli]

æ äï2013-09-10 æ 18:26 +0000ïMatthew Garrett æåï
> On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 14:23 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > That's why modern systems require signed firmware updates.
> > 
> > Linux doesn't.  Is someone working on adding signature support to the
> > runtime firmware loader?
> 
> It'd be simple to do so, but so far the model appears to be that devices
> that expect signed firmware enforce that themselves.
> 
> -- 
> Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>
> NrybXÇv^)Þ{.n+{y^nrzh&Gh(éÝj"mzÞfh~m

Takashi has a implementation of firmware check:

[PATCH RFC v2 0/4] Add firmware signature file check
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/8/343


Thanks
Joey Lee


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/