Re: [PATCH 2/6] extcon-gpio: If the gpio driver/chip supportsdebounce, use it

From: Chanwoo Choi
Date: Tue Sep 10 2013 - 21:16:43 EST


Hi Guenter

I agree to use gpio_set_debounce() API but, I suggest following patch to code clean.
and I'd like you to use declarative sentence on patch name instead of 'If ...'.

On 08/30/2013 01:29 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c
> index 77d35a7..973600e 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c
> @@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ static int gpio_extcon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret < 0)
> goto err;
>
> + /* Use gpio debounce if available. If so, don't debounce in software. */
> + if (pdata->debounce &&
> + !gpio_set_debounce(extcon_data->gpio, pdata->debounce * 1000))
> + extcon_data->debounce_jiffies = 0;
> +
> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&extcon_data->work, gpio_extcon_work);
>
> extcon_data->irq = gpio_to_irq(extcon_data->gpio);
>

diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c
index 3943ce2..0777e72 100644
--- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c
@@ -56,8 +56,10 @@ static irqreturn_t gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct gpio_extcon_data *extcon_data = dev_id;

- queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &extcon_data->work,
- extcon_data->debounce_jiffies);
+ if (extcon_data->debounce_jiffies)
+ queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
+ &extcon_data->work,
+ extcon_data->debounce_jiffies);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}

@@ -100,7 +102,14 @@ static int gpio_extcon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
extcon_data->state_off = pdata->state_off;
if (pdata->state_on && pdata->state_off)
extcon_data->edev.print_state = extcon_gpio_print_state;
- extcon_data->debounce_jiffies = msecs_to_jiffies(pdata->debounce);
+ extcon_data->debounce_jiffies = 0;
+ if (pdata->debounce) {
+ ret = gpio_set_debounce(extcon_data->gpio,
+ pdata->debounce * 1000);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ extcon_data->debounce_jiffies =
+ msecs_to_jiffies(pdata->debounce);
+ }

ret = extcon_dev_register(&extcon_data->edev, &pdev->dev);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -111,11 +120,6 @@ static int gpio_extcon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret < 0)
goto err;

- /* Use gpio debounce if available. If so, don't debounce in software. */
- if (pdata->debounce &&
- !gpio_set_debounce(extcon_data->gpio, pdata->debounce * 1000))
- extcon_data->debounce_jiffies = 0;
-
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&extcon_data->work, gpio_extcon_work);

extcon_data->irq = gpio_to_irq(extcon_data->gpio);
@@ -146,7 +150,8 @@ static int gpio_extcon_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct gpio_extcon_data *extcon_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);

- cancel_delayed_work_sync(&extcon_data->work);
+ if (extcon_data->debounce_jiffies)
+ cancel_delayed_work_sync(&extcon_data->work);
free_irq(extcon_data->irq, extcon_data);
extcon_dev_unregister(&extcon_data->edev);


Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/