[PATCH] security: remove erroneous comment about capabilities.o linkordering

From: Eric Paris
Date: Tue Sep 10 2013 - 09:51:50 EST


Back when we had half ass LSM stacking we had to link capabilities.o
after bigger LSMs so that on initialization the bigger LSM would
register first and the capabilities module would be the one stacked as
the 'seconday'. Somewhere around 6f0f0fd496333777d53 (back in 2008) we
finally removed the last of the kinda module stacking code but this
comment in the makefile still lives today.

Reported-by: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
security/Makefile | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/Makefile b/security/Makefile
index c26c81e..a5918e0 100644
--- a/security/Makefile
+++ b/security/Makefile
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MMU) += min_addr.o
# Object file lists
obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY) += security.o capability.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITYFS) += inode.o
-# Must precede capability.o in order to stack properly.
obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX) += selinux/built-in.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK) += smack/built-in.o
obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT) += lsm_audit.o

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/