[PATCH 15/50] sched: numa: Correct adjustment of numa_scan_period

[Mel Gorman]

numa_scan_period is in milliseconds, not jiffies. Properly placed pages
slow the scanning rate but adding 10 jiffies to numa_scan_period means
that the rate scanning slows depends on HZ which is confusing. Get rid
of the jiffies_to_msec conversion and treat it as ms.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 23fd1f3..29ba117 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ void task_numa_fault(int node, int pages, bool migrated)
 			p->numa_scan_period_max = task_scan_max(p);
 
 		p->numa_scan_period = min(p->numa_scan_period_max,
-			p->numa_scan_period + jiffies_to_msecs(10));
+			p->numa_scan_period + 10);
 	}
 
 	task_numa_placement(p);
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/