Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown

From: David Lang
Date: Mon Sep 09 2013 - 14:41:03 EST


On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Matthew Garrett wrote:

On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 11:25 -0700, David Lang wrote:

Given that we know that people want signed binaries without blocking kexec, you
should have '1' just enforce module signing and '2' (or higher) implement a full
lockdown including kexec.

There's already a kernel option for that.

So, if there is an existing kernel option for this, why do we need a new one?

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/