Re: [PATCHv3] ARM: OMAP2+: am335x-bone*: add DT for BeagleBone Black

[Matt Porter]

On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 02:51:13PM +0100, Jonathan Austin wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> 
> On 09/09/13 14:31, Matt Porter wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 01:12:26PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>The BeagleBone Black is basically a regular BeagleBone with eMMC and HDMI added,
> >>so create a common dtsi both can use.
> >>
> >>IMPORTANT: booting the existing am335x-bone.dts will blow up the HDMI transceiver
> >>after a dozen boots with an uSD card inserted because LDO will be at 3.3V instead
> >>of 1.8.
> >>
> >>MMC support for AM335x still isn't in, so only the LDO change has been added.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >Tested-by: Matt Porter <matt.porter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >Works fine for me on tip and 3.11. I did notice a regression in musb (worked
> >on 3.11, now failing to probe but this is not related to your new dts as it
> >happens on am335x-bone.dts too, assuming merge window volatility). One nit,
> >git-am picked up a whitespace error on that extra line at EOF so you should
> >trim that out.
> >
> >Only thing is...for a clear bug like this that will destroy hardware, it
> >should be marked Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to be picked up in stable.
> >
> 
> If I've understood Koen correctly then what he's saying is that if
> you *were* to use the current (before this patch) am335x-bone.dts on
> a Beagle Bone Black (which would be wrong, as that's not the board
> you have...) then things would break.
> 
> I don't see that this patch fixes that - as far as I can see, even
> after the patch, using am335x-bone.dts with a Bone Black will risk
> the damage?
> 
> If so, I don't think this is a 'stable fix' kind of thing, as it
> doesn't actually fix the problem?

It fixes the problem by providing the correct dts for BBB which the
vendor tree has had for sometime. In the absence of a specific dts
for BBB, it appears everybody (TI and OMAP maintainers, included)
has assumed that am335x-bone.dts is correct and safe.

I'm sure there's plenty of systems represented in dts/* where you
could cause damage by loading another dtb for a similar board from
the same SoC family...it's a common risk if you get the wrong dtb
with more-or-less arbitrary regulator settings.

-Matt

> 
> Koen - is there a way for a booting kernel to detect which board it
> is on and avoid any potential damage if someone gives it the wrong
> DT?
> 
> Jonny
> 
> >-Matt
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> >linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> >
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/