[PATCH 4/7] perf lock: redo __cmd_report

From: Davidlohr Bueso
Date: Sun Sep 08 2013 - 22:20:33 EST


This function should be straightforward, and we can remove some
trivial logic by moving the functionality of read_events() into
__cmd_report() - thus allowing a new session to be properly deleted.

Since the 'info' subcommand also needs to process the recorded events,
add a 'display_info' flag to differentiate between report and info
commands.

Furthermore, this patch also calls perf_session__has_traces(),
making sure that we don't compare apples and oranges, fixing a segfault
when using an perf.data file generated by a different subcommand. ie:

./perf mem record sleep 1
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.017 MB perf.data (~724 samples) ]

./perf lock report
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/builtin-lock.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
index 7784347..780484f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
@@ -818,6 +818,18 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool __maybe_unused,
return 0;
}

+static void sort_result(void)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+ struct lock_stat *st;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < LOCKHASH_SIZE; i++) {
+ list_for_each_entry(st, &lockhash_table[i], hash_entry) {
+ insert_to_result(st, compare);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
static const struct perf_evsel_str_handler lock_tracepoints[] = {
{ "lock:lock_acquire", perf_evsel__process_lock_acquire, }, /* CONFIG_LOCKDEP */
{ "lock:lock_acquired", perf_evsel__process_lock_acquired, }, /* CONFIG_LOCKDEP, CONFIG_LOCK_STAT */
@@ -825,51 +837,47 @@ static const struct perf_evsel_str_handler lock_tracepoints[] = {
{ "lock:lock_release", perf_evsel__process_lock_release, }, /* CONFIG_LOCKDEP */
};

-static int read_events(void)
+static int __cmd_report(bool display_info)
{
+ int err = -EINVAL;
struct perf_tool eops = {
.sample = process_sample_event,
.comm = perf_event__process_comm,
.ordered_samples = true,
};
+
session = perf_session__new(input_name, O_RDONLY, 0, false, &eops);
if (!session) {
pr_err("Initializing perf session failed\n");
- return -1;
+ return -ENOMEM;
}

+ if (!perf_session__has_traces(session, "lock record"))
+ goto out_delete;
+
if (perf_session__set_tracepoints_handlers(session, lock_tracepoints)) {
pr_err("Initializing perf session tracepoint handlers failed\n");
- return -1;
+ goto out_delete;
}

- return perf_session__process_events(session, &eops);
-}
+ if (select_key())
+ goto out_delete;

-static void sort_result(void)
-{
- unsigned int i;
- struct lock_stat *st;
-
- for (i = 0; i < LOCKHASH_SIZE; i++) {
- list_for_each_entry(st, &lockhash_table[i], hash_entry) {
- insert_to_result(st, compare);
- }
- }
-}
+ err = perf_session__process_events(session, &eops);
+ if (err)
+ goto out_delete;

-static int __cmd_report(void)
-{
setup_pager();
+ if (display_info) /* used for info subcommand */
+ err = dump_info();
+ else {
+ sort_result();
+ print_result();
+ }

- if ((select_key() != 0) ||
- (read_events() != 0))
- return -1;
-
- sort_result();
- print_result();
-
- return 0;
+out_delete:
+ perf_session__delete(session);
+ return err;
}

static int __cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
@@ -970,7 +978,7 @@ int cmd_lock(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
if (argc)
usage_with_options(report_usage, report_options);
}
- __cmd_report();
+ rc = __cmd_report(false);
} else if (!strcmp(argv[0], "script")) {
/* Aliased to 'perf script' */
return cmd_script(argc, argv, prefix);
@@ -983,11 +991,7 @@ int cmd_lock(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
}
/* recycling report_lock_ops */
trace_handler = &report_lock_ops;
- setup_pager();
- if (read_events() != 0)
- rc = -1;
- else
- rc = dump_info();
+ rc = __cmd_report(true);
} else {
usage_with_options(lock_usage, lock_options);
}
--
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/