Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] spinlock: A new lockref structure for locklessupdate of refcount

From: Al Viro
Date: Sun Sep 08 2013 - 20:57:48 EST


On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 05:38:46PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > That should also work, replacing the current tip of #for-next. Do you
> > prefer to merge those two diffs of yours into a single commit?
>
> If you're ok with my patch (it's now also tested, I'm running with it
> and it looks fine), I'll commit that one as-is.

OK... I'm dropping 38373e1ee72bf57b6f9b1ab0979a60887352c7e6, then...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/