Re: [sched next] overflowed cpu time for kernel threads in/proc/PID/stat

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:01:17PM +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (08/31/13 01:04), Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > But stime should always be below rtime due to the calculation done by scale_stime()
> > which roughly sums up to:
> > 
> >       stime = (stime / stime + utime) * rtime
> > 
> > So this shouldn't happen.
> > 
> > I couldn't manage to reproduce it though. Can you still trigger it with latest -next?
> > 
> > Thanks.
> 
> Hello,
> I can't pull current -next (away from good network connection for a
> couple of days). What I have is 3.11.0-rc7-next-20130829:
> 
> ps aux | grep rcu
> root         8  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Aug30   0:00 [rcuc/0]
> root         9  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Aug30   0:00 [rcub/0]
> root        10 21376376  0.0  0     0 ?        S    Aug30 21114581:36 [rcu_preempt]
> root        11 21376376  0.0  0     0 ?        S    Aug30 21114581:35 [rcuop/0]
> root        12 21376376  0.0  0     0 ?        S    Aug30 21114581:35 [rcuop/1]
> 
> cat /proc/10/stat
> 10 (rcu_preempt) S 2 0 0 0 -1 2129984 0 0 0 0 1844674407370 715 0 0 20 0 1 0 10 0 0 18446744073709551615 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2147483647 0 18446744073709551615 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> 
> 	-ss

Sorry, I did not realize this message was posted before you tested the patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/