Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 8/9] nohz_full: Add full-system-idle statemachine
From: Yann E. MORIN
Date: Sun Sep 08 2013 - 06:33:05 EST
Paul, All,
On 2013-09-07 11:57 -0700, Paul E. McKenney spake thusly:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 11:13:48AM +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
[--SNIP--]
> > I'll see if I can come up with a meaningfull construct that fixes your
> > use-case. Don't hold your breath, though! ;-)
>
> If not, we need to add NR_CPUS to the architectures lacking them...
Unfortunately, I was not able to come up with anything suitable.
I think your proposal to always define NR_CPUS=1 for architectures
without SMP support is a good solution.
After all, if !SMP because the architecture does not support it, I
believe it makes sense that NR_CPUS be defined to 1.
Unless NR_CPUS carries with it a hidden meaning about SMP being
possible, that is, which would probably be wrong anyway, since we have
SMP for this.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/