Re: [ 00/14] 3.4.61-stable review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:47:01AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 09/05/2013 02:28 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.61 release.
> >There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >let me know.
> >
> >Responses should be made by Sat Sep  7 20:25:41 UTC 2013.
> >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> >The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.61-rc1.gz
> >and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> >thanks,
> >
> >greg k-h
> >
> >-------------
> 
> 
> 3.4.61-rc1 applied cleanly to 3.4.60
> 
> Compiled and booted on the following systems:
> 
> Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5
> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
> 
> dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for
> this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No
> regressions in warn.

Thanks for testing and letting me know.

> Compile tested on Samsung Chromebook Exynos5 (ARMv7):
> 3.4.60 compile fail - it is not a regression. Existing issue in
> 3.4.y It has to do with missing config selections in
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig for this system. Debugging now using
> the Kconfig selections from 3.10.y for this file.

Is there a patch I can backport for this to work properly?  I'd like to
get some type of ARM coverage if possible.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/