Re: OCFS2: ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR: block 532737 had the JBDbit set while I was in lock_buffer!

[Mark Fasheh]

On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:25:04PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Hmm, not fun.
> >> In my case I'm not using NFS or any other network filesystem.
> >> The OCFS2 is also used in local mode (no cluster).
> >>
> >> What really worries me is that this another proof that Oracles OCFS2 branch is out of sync with mainline.
> > 
> > Can you show me what branch you are talking about here?
> 
> https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git seems to contain fixes for years
> which are not mainline.

Ok just FYI I don't believe that to actually be the case - there might be
one or two fixes that were changed when ported to mainline and
there's certainly the possiblity that a mistake was made. But generally
fixes went from mainline into the 1.4 repository and not the other way.

That's not to say things haven't been slow on the Ocfs2 front lately or
anything, but I don't believe it to be the case that fixees are regularly
being put into an Oracle tree that haven't seen mainline.
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/