Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [PATCH] checkpatch: Add comment aboutupdating Documentation/CodingStyle

[Josh Triplett]

On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:59:27AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 15:39 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Mon, 2 Sep 2013 11:19:01 -0700
> > Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> []
> > > +# This file does not define the kernel coding style; Documentation/CodingStyle
> > > +# does.  If you add a new style test to this file, add the corresponding style
> > > +# rule it enforces to Documentation/CodingStyle.
> 
> > Agreed with that.
> 
> I do not.
> 
> > I would also add another comment there: "in case of
> > conflicts between checkpatch.pl and Documentation/CodingStyle, the latter
> > takes precedence."
> 
> There are many checkpatch rules (like semicolons) that
> are not in CodingStyle.

It's a rule of thumb, not a mandate.  In *general*, checkpatch.pl should
not be enforcing style rules that aren't documented in CodingStyle.

> CodingStyle should not become some intensely detailed
> document that specifies the "only one true way" to
> write code.

Any rule that maintainers are likely to enforce on patches they review
should live in Documentation/CodingStyle; unwritten rules are a bad
idea.  Any rule that maintainers are *not* likely to enforce shouldn't
go in scripts/checkpatch.pl.

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/