Re: [PATCH 2/2] fuse: wait for writeback in fuse_file_fallocate() -v2

From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Fri Aug 30 2013 - 05:13:56 EST


On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> BTW, isn't it enough to do the filemap_write_and_wait() *plus* the
> fuse_set_nowrite()?

Thought about it a bit and I think this should do fine.

Any writes before the fallocate will go trough before the fallocate.
i_mutex guarantees that only one instance of fuse_set_nowrite() is
running. Any mmaped writes during the fallocate() will go after the
fallocate request and the page cache truncation and that's fine too.
Page cache is consistent since it doens't contain pages for those
writes to the hole. Subsequent reads to that area will fill them in.

Any other concerns?

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/