Re: [Query] CPUFreq: Does these machines have separate clock domainsfor CPUs?

[Magnus Damm]

Hi Viresh,

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup work and
> wanted to know if the below mentioned machines have separate
> clock domains for their CPUs or all share the same domain?
>
> So, that we can use some generic routines for these drivers which
> would eventually do:
>
> cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
>
> And I wanted to make sure that this doesn't break them.. :)
>
> ......
>
> The drivers are:
...
> drivers/cpufreq/sh-cpufreq.c
...

The above SH cpufreq driver seems to be written with SMP in mind, but
I would say SMP is a very rare case for SH. So I believe it can be
considered as UP-only at this point. If Paul disagrees I'm quite sure
he will tell us.

Cheers,

/ magnus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/