Re: Improve preempt-scheduling and x86 user access v3

[Ingo Molnar]

* Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Various optimizations related to CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY and x86 
> uaccess

Looks mostly good.

Does this patchset change the number of cond_resched() preemption points 
on CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y, or is it a scheduling invariant?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/