Re: [PATCH] DMA: let filter functions of of_dma_simple_xlatepossible check of_node

[Vinod Koul]

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 08:15:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 26 August 2013 19:40:57 Vinod Koul wrote:
> > And the selection should be done for the cases where you dont have programmable
> > mux in dmac. For programmable ones passing slave_id in dma_slave_config should
> > be fine.
> 
> I think passing a slave_id from the slave driver is never correct with DT,
> since the ID is a property of the system rather than the slave device, so
> the driver has no access to it. Drivers have to always take the settings
> from DT and ignore what dma_slave_config() sets later.
Shouldnt slave id be property of the client driver. That way we can pass it to
the driver using dma_slave_config(). That should make it right..

~Vinod

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/