Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] tracing: Add support for SOFT_DISABLE tosyscall events

From: Tom Zanussi
Date: Tue Aug 27 2013 - 19:29:25 EST


On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 16:01 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:40:13 -0500
> Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> return;
> > - if (!test_bit(syscall_nr, tr->enabled_enter_syscalls))
> > +
> > + /* Here we're inside the tp handler's rcu_read_lock (__DO_TRACE()) */
> > + ftrace_file = rcu_dereference_raw(tr->enter_syscall_files[syscall_nr]);
>
> What's the reason for using rcu_dereference_raw() and not normal
> rcu_dereference?
>

This is because we know the tracepoint handler has rcu_read_lock_held()
and so we don't need to do the rcu_dereference_check().

Tom

> -- Steve
>
> > + if (!ftrace_file)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (test_bit(FTRACE_EVENT_FL_SOFT_DISABLED_BIT, &ftrace_file->flags))
> > return;
> >


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/